Bombay HC: Citizens Not Slaves, Protests Against Government Are Not Grounds for Externment

Context mode is active. Hover over any highlighted term to see its definition. Click a nested term to go deeper.
In a landmark ruling, the Bombay High Court has declared that citizens are not 'slaves' of the government and cannot be banished, or 'externed', simply for protesting or raising slogans against its policies. Justice Madhav Jamdar vehemently quashed a year-long externment order against political activist Saeed Ahmad Abdul Wahid Chaudhary, emphasizing that such actions infringe upon fundamental constitutional rights. This decision sends a powerful message against suppressing democratic dissent and reasserts the crucial role of judicial oversight in safeguarding civil liberties. The ruling specifically dismantled an externment order issued by the Maharashtra Police under the Maharashtra Police Act, which had cited Chaudhary's participation in protests against decisions like the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the Gyanvapi mosque controversy as grounds for removal. Justice Jamdar, in a strong condemnation, highlighted that the police's action was 'mala fide' and directly violated Chaudhary's fundamental rights to freedom of speech and expression (Article 19) and the right to live with dignity (Article 21). The court stressed that police officers are public servants, not political masters. This judgment is expected to bolster the right to protest across India, setting a precedent that mere opposition to government policies cannot justify extreme preventive measures. Authorities will now face closer scrutiny when invoking laws like the Maharashtra Police Act for externment, forcing them to demonstrate concrete threats to public order rather than relying on political dissent. The ruling serves as a vital reminder that a healthy democracy thrives on open debate and the protected right of its citizens to voice grievances without fear of banishment.