Is your sunscreen safe? What doctors say about the new EWG rankings

Context mode is active. Hover over any highlighted term to see its definition. Click a nested term to go deeper.
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has dropped its 2024 annual Sunscreen Guide, evaluating over 2,700 products and giving a nod of approval to just 550. The non-profit advocacy organization continues its stark recommendation for mineral-based sunscreens, primarily those utilizing zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, over chemical UV filters. Their latest findings flag persistent concerns regarding widely used chemical active ingredients like oxybenzone, avobenzone, and octinoxate, citing potential issues with endocrine disruption, systemic absorption, and environmental toxicity, particularly to coral reefs. The report underscores a critical gap in product efficacy, noting many sunscreens fail to provide adequate broad-spectrum protection or maintain photostability. This annual report injects fresh urgency into the ongoing public health discourse surrounding UV protection and consumer safety, particularly within the burgeoning clean beauty movement. Amidst a macro backdrop of heightened consumer scrutiny over product ingredients and a slow-moving regulatory apparatus, particularly from bodies like the FDA in the US, the EWG rankings empower Gen-Z consumers to make informed choices. The market for personal care products is increasingly bifurcated, with "mineral-only" formulations gaining significant market share, driving innovation in cosmetic elegance for these once-chalky options. This shift not only challenges traditional sunscreen manufacturers but also amplifies calls for expedited regulatory review of novel, safer UV filters already prevalent in European and Asian markets, highlighting a global divergence in chemical safety standards.