Siddharthnagar News: रजिस्ट्री कार्यालय व राजस्व न्यायालयों में काम ठप

Advocates and document writers in Siddharthnagar have brought government services to a grinding halt, joining a wider Uttar Pradesh-wide protest against the state's new e-registration system. Since Monday, work at registry office and revenue courts has been completely stalled, driven by fears that the digital shift amounts to privatization and threatens the livelihoods of thousands of legal professionals. This isn't just a local issue; it's a direct confrontation over the future of land governance and legal professions across India's most populous state. This current standoff in Siddharthnagar mirrors similar strikes recently seen in Greater Noida, Meerut, and Mathura, all protesting the Uttar Pradesh government's move towards digital property registration. While the government insists the e-registration system aims to simplify transactions, reduce fraud, and boost transparency by applying only to specific government-executed deeds, advocates and deed writers remain unconvinced. They argue that even a limited digital rollout could eventually expand, rendering their traditional services redundant and stripping them of their income, underscoring a deep-seated tension between modernization efforts and job security. The Allahabad High Court has recently criticized such strikes as 'illegal' and detrimental to litigants, highlighting the judicial perspective on these disruptions. With the Uttar Pradesh government pushing ahead with broader digital reforms like title-based registration to curb fraud and integrate land records, the current protests signal a critical juncture. The ongoing deadlock could force the administration to re-evaluate how it balances technological advancement with the socio-economic concerns of its legal fraternity. Observers will be watching closely to see if a resolution emerges that addresses the advocates' job security fears, or if this marks the beginning of a deeper transformation in India's property registration landscape. The long-term impact on citizens seeking legal ownership of their property remains a significant concern.