Supreme Court Clears Art of Living: No Proof of Yamuna Floodplain Damage, 5 Cr Refund Ordered

Context mode is active. Hover over any highlighted term to see its definition. Click a nested term to go deeper.
In a major legal victory, India's Supreme Court on Saturday cleared the Art of Living Foundation of all allegations of environmental damage linked to its 2016 World Culture Festival on the Yamuna Floodplains. The apex court set aside a 2017 order by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) that had imposed a ₹5 crore fine, citing a lack of 'direct evidence' to prove the festival caused ecological harm. The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has now been directed to refund the penalty within four weeks, bringing a decade-long legal battle to a decisive close. The ruling by a bench of Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and N.K. Singh highlighted the NGT failure to establish a clear causal link between the event and the alleged degradation, noting that the site was already in a 'dilapidated condition' before the festival began. This judgment underscores the stringent standard of proof required in environmental liability cases, particularly when large-scale events are involved. Environmental activists, including Manoj Misra, had initially brought the case before the NGT, arguing that the massive cultural gathering caused irreparable damage to the fragile Yamuna ecosystem. While the Art of Living Foundation is now absolved, the Supreme Court firmly reiterated that the Delhi Development Authority still holds the responsibility for the ongoing rehabilitation of the Yamuna floodplains, upholding its duties under the Public Trust Doctrine. This decision is expected to spark discussions about the evidence standards for environmental cases and the roles of various authorities in managing ecologically sensitive zones. Observers will be watching for potential legislative or judicial responses to clarify the framework for similar events in the future.